"AI will take our jobs" is a low job resolution.
2022-08-31
Some jobs are easy to automate with AI and others are difficult, and the easiest to automate will be replaced by the least easy to automate.
https://gyazo.com/d19b8ab4799206776d4f71e239358d91
Person A, who can use AI, will benefit from automation and get 5 results in 4 hours.
For person B, who cannot use AI, 1/5 of his job is lost.
Whether or not it's an AI" isn't very essential.
It just means that when a new tool is introduced, some people can learn that tool and some can't.
Those who cannot master it will be at a disadvantage in the marketplace. This is a given.
What happens to Mr. B's job at this time is that he moves to Mr. A.
https://gyazo.com/d7afe17543531b4e2f399e0513883fd8
This work used to consume a lot of human time, so Mr. A couldn't do a lot of it.
automation is "lowering the consumption of human time," so those who can automate will be able to do more work in the same amount of time @CrubClub: only if AI is the property of workers, not management. Right. Good point. In that sense, Stable Diffusion running on a consumer PC that costs less than 200,000 is a historical epoch.
relevance
A person A who can use AI will benefit from automation and get 5 results in 4 hours.
I'm so busy chopping wood I don't have time to sharpen my axe."
By refusing to learn, you lose the opportunity to learn.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「AIに仕事を奪われる」は仕事の解像度が低い using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.